PROJECT PROPOSAL:
THE IMPACT OF INTER-GOVERNMENTAL
RELATIONS ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION IN NIGERIA
Introduction
Intergovernmental relations (IGR)
provide a platform for series of legal, political and administrative
collaboration between levels of government with varying degree of autonomy.
It is generally referred to as the transaction between levels of government, either
national or regional or among federal, state and local governments (Ajulor and
Okewale, 2011). Such relationships among the tiers of government are not
without tension and conflict. As important as local government administration has
been, there seems to be some constraints that have been infringing on its
operations over the years. These challenges range from political but undue
interference of federal and state governments, coupled with high rate of
bribery and corruption to embezzlement and gross inadequacy of well-trained and
qualified human resources among others (Akhakpe, Fatile & Igbokwe-Ibeto,
2012).
The achievement of the objectives of intergovernmental
relations is dependent on some social factors within the Nigerian social
System. Some social factors include the
political setting and the state of the economy in the nation. Looking at the political setting, the intergovernmental
relation is basically based on the three tiers of government that is the
Federal, State and Local Government. But
come to look at that, the Federal and State Government is said to have more
autonomy than local government due to the fact that they are the last tier of
government (John Nwafor: Unpublished work).
That is why local government is not given its full autonomy to do things
on its own. The other tiers of the
government still tell them what to do, how to make their own policies, how to
elect/appoint those to rule them like the Chancellor or Chairmen and so on. Local
Government is still dependent on the other tiers of government making them too
subordinate and loyal for my liking (Nwokedi, Ralph: 2002)
Modern local government administration
in Nigeria began during the British colonial rule. But then the system was not
uniform. The restructuring and provision of some level of roles, democratic
existence and funding of local government administration began in 1976. The
1976 local government reform introduced a uniform system of local government
administration throughout the country, recognized local government as third
tier of government and granted financial and functional autonomy to local
government administration in Nigeria. The reform was a major departure from the
previous practice of local government administration in Nigeria (Oviasuyi,
Idada & Isiraojie, 2010).
As noted in the works of Adeyemi (2012),
Achimugu, Stephen & Agboni (2013), Chukwuemekaet al., (2014), the Nigeria
1976 Guideline for Local Government Reform defines local government
as:Government at the local levelestablished by law to exercise specific powers
within defined area (and) toinitiate and direct the provision of services and
to determine and implement projects so as to complement the activities of the
state and federal government in their areas, and to ensure that local initiative
and response to local needs and conditions are maximized.
In addition, local government is seen as
a system of government whereby the state allows the establishmentof local units
of government with powers and authority to make local decisions on matters that
affect the local communities and to mobilize local resources for implementation
or execution of the decisions made (Eboh & Diejomaoh, 2010).
Many writers are however of the view
that within the setting of intergovernmental relations, local government is not
autonomous and cannot be completely autonomous. Adeyemo (2005) belongs to this
school of thought when he argued that there can never be an absolute autonomy
because of the interdependence of the three levels of government and this brings
into focus the inter-governmental context of local government autonomy. The
federal, state and local governments rule over the same population. If they are
to achieve the purpose of their creation and not to waste the meagre resources
at their disposal, there must be a definition of the boundaries or arena of
operation of each of them. (Wada,
Aminu; 2014)
Ukertor (2009:339) averred that local
government autonomy refers to the degree accorded the third tier of government
with respect to legal, administrative, and financial independence within
constitutional limits. He contended that, whereas intergovernmental relations
should be characterized by partnership, but control appears to be the dominant
theme in Nigeria.
According
to Opeskin (1998, p. 11), the term “intergovernmental relations” is commonly
used to refer to relations between central, regional, and local governments
that facilitate the attainment of common goals through cooperation. Used in
this sense, mechanisms for intergovernmental relations may be seen as employing
consensual tools for the mutual benefit of the constituent units of the state.
For Van der Waldt and Du Toit (1997, p. 162) intergovernmental relations refer
to the mutual relations and interactions between government institutions at
horizontal and vertical levels. This is in line with Thornhill’s (2002, p. 8)
definition that “intergovernmental relations consist of all the actions and
transactions of politicians and officials in national, sub-national units of
government and organs of the state”. All of which are in line with Adamolekun’s
(1999, p. 53) position that it deals with the relationships between government
and sub-national units, hence Ademolekun (1986, p. 89) defines
intergovernmental relations as the interactions that take place among the
levels of government within a state.
Crucial to this relation amongst spheres of government are statutory
bodies (legislative backing) and non-statutory bodies (constituted by
government for a specific task) as these can promote intergovernmental
relations in the form of committees, boards or a range of other bodies (Kuye,
Thornhill & Fourie, 2002, p. 45).
Thus, the evaluation of the mutual
working relationship between and amongst the federal, state and local
governments in Nigeria, just like that of advanced democracies is germane to
this study.It will therefore expose the challenges
facing the Local government administration in a cooperative government and how
they can be minimized to achieve efficient service delivery. It would also be
of great significance to researchers by way of making them aware of the
findings that have been uncovered in this research, so that they would know
where to start from in their subsequent research work in the area of
inter-governmental relations in Nigeria.
Statement of the
Problem The nature of intergovernmental relation
in Nigeria has over the years eroded the powers and functions ofLocal
government administration in Nigeria. It has subsequently relegated the third
tier of government in a federation (i.e. local government) to a subsidiary or
an appendage of the second tier of government (i.e. the state government).
Local Government taxes are minimal hence this limits their ability to raise
independent revenue and so they depend solely on allocation from the federation
account.
This has no doubt created unhealthy rivalry between local
government and other levels of government has a result of a number of
interrelated factors, such as: undue interference by the state government,
unconstitutional removal of the local government chairmen by some state
governments, shortening of local government chairmen’s tenure of office, joint
state-local government account, which the former controls and what the states
perceive to be an attempt by the federal government to relate directly with
local governments.
These and other challenges facing
local government administration have rendered it incapable of producing good
governance and democratic dividends to the people of the grassroots. This study
is timely as it evaluates the impact of intergovernmental relations on local
government administration in Nigeria.
Research Questions The research questions that will guide
the study are as follows:
1.
Does
the constitution make provision for intergovernmental relations in Nigeria?
2.
What
are the areas of intergovernmental relations in Nigeria?
3.
What
is the relevance of intergovernmental relations in local government in Nigeria?
4.
What
are the causes of conflicts between the levels of government in Nigeria?
5.
What
effects has intergovernmental relations had on Local Government Administration?
Objectives
of the Study
The main objective of the
study is to evaluate the Impact of Inter-governmental Relations on Local
Government Administration in Nigeria, with particular reference to Ijebu North
Local Government Area of Ogun State. Other
objectives of this study are to
i.
examine
the relevance of intergovernmental relations in Nigeria;
ii.
identify
the areas of conflicts and cooperativeness among the tiers of government as it
affects the local government administration; and
iii.
recommend measures required
for an improved intergovernmental relations in Nigeria
suitable for increased development at the grass root level.
ResearchMethodology Research methodology is the process of carrying out a
research. It tends to describe the various steps used in achieving the
objective of the study. According to Okaja (2003, p.2), research design
“is the structure and strategy for obtaining a reliable and valid result of a
problem.” The research
method that will be used in this work is the survey method. Survey research
studies both large and small populations by selecting and studying samples
chosen from the population. It is therefore an appropriate method of research
on the Impact of Intergovernmental
Relations on Local Government Administration in Nigeria. Thestudy
will be carried out in Ijebu North Local Government, Ogun State, where its
headquarters are in the town of Ijebu Igbo, having a population of 284,336 at
the 2006 census.The researcher
considered this areadue to its near distance, familiarity, and availability of
respondentsin order to save time and cost. In
this study, the primary and secondary sources of data collection will be
adopted. The primary data will be derived through the use of self-administered
questionnaires, while the secondary data will be derived from newspapers,
journals, and the internet. A purposive sampling technique willbe used, thereby having
a sample size of 150 respondents which will include staffs (senior and junior)
of the various departments in the local government. Not left out are
stakeholders,academicians and studentsin the related field, and other members
of the public. The selection is therefore intended to represent a broader view
of the Nigerian societywith the assumption that they are more informed
enough to discuss issues related to the impact of Intergovernmental Relations
on Local Government administration in Nigeria. Thus,
the data generated for the study will therefore be presented and analyzed usingsimple
tables and percentages.
Introduction
Intergovernmental relations (IGR)
provide a platform for series of legal, political and administrative
collaboration between levels of government with varying degree of autonomy.
It is generally referred to as the transaction between levels of government, either
national or regional or among federal, state and local governments (Ajulor and
Okewale, 2011). Such relationships among the tiers of government are not
without tension and conflict. As important as local government administration has
been, there seems to be some constraints that have been infringing on its
operations over the years. These challenges range from political but undue
interference of federal and state governments, coupled with high rate of
bribery and corruption to embezzlement and gross inadequacy of well-trained and
qualified human resources among others (Akhakpe, Fatile & Igbokwe-Ibeto,
2012).
The achievement of the objectives of intergovernmental
relations is dependent on some social factors within the Nigerian social
System. Some social factors include the
political setting and the state of the economy in the nation. Looking at the political setting, the intergovernmental
relation is basically based on the three tiers of government that is the
Federal, State and Local Government. But
come to look at that, the Federal and State Government is said to have more
autonomy than local government due to the fact that they are the last tier of
government (John Nwafor: Unpublished work).
That is why local government is not given its full autonomy to do things
on its own. The other tiers of the
government still tell them what to do, how to make their own policies, how to
elect/appoint those to rule them like the Chancellor or Chairmen and so on. Local
Government is still dependent on the other tiers of government making them too
subordinate and loyal for my liking (Nwokedi, Ralph: 2002)
Modern local government administration
in Nigeria began during the British colonial rule. But then the system was not
uniform. The restructuring and provision of some level of roles, democratic
existence and funding of local government administration began in 1976. The
1976 local government reform introduced a uniform system of local government
administration throughout the country, recognized local government as third
tier of government and granted financial and functional autonomy to local
government administration in Nigeria. The reform was a major departure from the
previous practice of local government administration in Nigeria (Oviasuyi,
Idada & Isiraojie, 2010).
As noted in the works of Adeyemi (2012),
Achimugu, Stephen & Agboni (2013), Chukwuemekaet al., (2014), the Nigeria
1976 Guideline for Local Government Reform defines local government
as:Government at the local levelestablished by law to exercise specific powers
within defined area (and) toinitiate and direct the provision of services and
to determine and implement projects so as to complement the activities of the
state and federal government in their areas, and to ensure that local initiative
and response to local needs and conditions are maximized.
In addition, local government is seen as
a system of government whereby the state allows the establishmentof local units
of government with powers and authority to make local decisions on matters that
affect the local communities and to mobilize local resources for implementation
or execution of the decisions made (Eboh & Diejomaoh, 2010).
Many writers are however of the view
that within the setting of intergovernmental relations, local government is not
autonomous and cannot be completely autonomous. Adeyemo (2005) belongs to this
school of thought when he argued that there can never be an absolute autonomy
because of the interdependence of the three levels of government and this brings
into focus the inter-governmental context of local government autonomy. The
federal, state and local governments rule over the same population. If they are
to achieve the purpose of their creation and not to waste the meagre resources
at their disposal, there must be a definition of the boundaries or arena of
operation of each of them. (Wada,
Aminu; 2014)
Ukertor (2009:339) averred that local
government autonomy refers to the degree accorded the third tier of government
with respect to legal, administrative, and financial independence within
constitutional limits. He contended that, whereas intergovernmental relations
should be characterized by partnership, but control appears to be the dominant
theme in Nigeria.
According
to Opeskin (1998, p. 11), the term “intergovernmental relations” is commonly
used to refer to relations between central, regional, and local governments
that facilitate the attainment of common goals through cooperation. Used in
this sense, mechanisms for intergovernmental relations may be seen as employing
consensual tools for the mutual benefit of the constituent units of the state.
For Van der Waldt and Du Toit (1997, p. 162) intergovernmental relations refer
to the mutual relations and interactions between government institutions at
horizontal and vertical levels. This is in line with Thornhill’s (2002, p. 8)
definition that “intergovernmental relations consist of all the actions and
transactions of politicians and officials in national, sub-national units of
government and organs of the state”. All of which are in line with Adamolekun’s
(1999, p. 53) position that it deals with the relationships between government
and sub-national units, hence Ademolekun (1986, p. 89) defines
intergovernmental relations as the interactions that take place among the
levels of government within a state.
Crucial to this relation amongst spheres of government are statutory
bodies (legislative backing) and non-statutory bodies (constituted by
government for a specific task) as these can promote intergovernmental
relations in the form of committees, boards or a range of other bodies (Kuye,
Thornhill & Fourie, 2002, p. 45).
Thus, the evaluation of the mutual
working relationship between and amongst the federal, state and local
governments in Nigeria, just like that of advanced democracies is germane to
this study.It will therefore expose the challenges
facing the Local government administration in a cooperative government and how
they can be minimized to achieve efficient service delivery. It would also be
of great significance to researchers by way of making them aware of the
findings that have been uncovered in this research, so that they would know
where to start from in their subsequent research work in the area of
inter-governmental relations in Nigeria.
Statement of the
Problem The nature of intergovernmental relation
in Nigeria has over the years eroded the powers and functions ofLocal
government administration in Nigeria. It has subsequently relegated the third
tier of government in a federation (i.e. local government) to a subsidiary or
an appendage of the second tier of government (i.e. the state government).
Local Government taxes are minimal hence this limits their ability to raise
independent revenue and so they depend solely on allocation from the federation
account.
This has no doubt created unhealthy rivalry between local
government and other levels of government has a result of a number of
interrelated factors, such as: undue interference by the state government,
unconstitutional removal of the local government chairmen by some state
governments, shortening of local government chairmen’s tenure of office, joint
state-local government account, which the former controls and what the states
perceive to be an attempt by the federal government to relate directly with
local governments.
These and other challenges facing
local government administration have rendered it incapable of producing good
governance and democratic dividends to the people of the grassroots. This study
is timely as it evaluates the impact of intergovernmental relations on local
government administration in Nigeria.
Research Questions The research questions that will guide
the study are as follows:
1.
Does
the constitution make provision for intergovernmental relations in Nigeria?
2.
What
are the areas of intergovernmental relations in Nigeria?
3.
What
is the relevance of intergovernmental relations in local government in Nigeria?
4.
What
are the causes of conflicts between the levels of government in Nigeria?
5.
What
effects has intergovernmental relations had on Local Government Administration?
Objectives
of the Study
The main objective of the
study is to evaluate the Impact of Inter-governmental Relations on Local
Government Administration in Nigeria, with particular reference to Ijebu North
Local Government Area of Ogun State. Other
objectives of this study are to
i.
examine
the relevance of intergovernmental relations in Nigeria;
ii.
identify
the areas of conflicts and cooperativeness among the tiers of government as it
affects the local government administration; and
iii.
recommend measures required
for an improved intergovernmental relations in Nigeria
suitable for increased development at the grass root level.
ResearchMethodology Research methodology is the process of carrying out a
research. It tends to describe the various steps used in achieving the
objective of the study. According to Okaja (2003, p.2), research design
“is the structure and strategy for obtaining a reliable and valid result of a
problem.” The research
method that will be used in this work is the survey method. Survey research
studies both large and small populations by selecting and studying samples
chosen from the population. It is therefore an appropriate method of research
on the Impact of Intergovernmental
Relations on Local Government Administration in Nigeria. Thestudy
will be carried out in Ijebu North Local Government, Ogun State, where its
headquarters are in the town of Ijebu Igbo, having a population of 284,336 at
the 2006 census.The researcher
considered this areadue to its near distance, familiarity, and availability of
respondentsin order to save time and cost. In
this study, the primary and secondary sources of data collection will be
adopted. The primary data will be derived through the use of self-administered
questionnaires, while the secondary data will be derived from newspapers,
journals, and the internet. A purposive sampling technique willbe used, thereby having
a sample size of 150 respondents which will include staffs (senior and junior)
of the various departments in the local government. Not left out are
stakeholders,academicians and studentsin the related field, and other members
of the public. The selection is therefore intended to represent a broader view
of the Nigerian societywith the assumption that they are more informed
enough to discuss issues related to the impact of Intergovernmental Relations
on Local Government administration in Nigeria. Thus,
the data generated for the study will therefore be presented and analyzed usingsimple
tables and percentages.
No comments:
Post a Comment